Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs Forrest city, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs Forrest city, AR.

Data Hanover park Forrest city
Population 36,376 12,676
Median Age 34.7 years 35.2 years
Median Income $88,460 $36,368
Married Families 39.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 6.5

Population Comparison: Hanover park vs Forrest city

  • In Hanover park, the population is higher at 36,376, compared to 12,676 in Forrest city.
  • The median age in Forrest city is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460 compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover park at 39.0% compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forrest city at 20%, compared to 6% in Hanover park.
  • Forrest city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.6% in Hanover park.

Demographics

Demographics Hanover park vs Forrest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hanover park Forrest city
Black 8 73
White 17 16
Asian 20 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 6
Two or More Races 15 4
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs Forrest city

  • In Forrest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher percentage of White residents at 17% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 0% in Forrest city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 6% in Forrest city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover park at 15% compared to 4% in Forrest city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hanover park and Forrest city at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hanover park Forrest city
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 16.5%
Depression 16.1% 21.2%
Smoking 13.1% 26.2%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 12.5%
Obesity 30.5% 49.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs Forrest city

  • In Forrest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forrest city at 21.2% versus 16.1% in Hanover park.
  • Forrest city has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
  • Forrest city has higher obesity rates at 49.7% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forrest city at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hanover park Forrest city
No Schooling 2.1% (758) 0.8% (105)
High School Diploma 16.2% (5,894) 21.3% (2,698)
Less than High School 21.1% (7,688) 17.7% (2,241)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.0% (6,537) 8.9% (1,122)

Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs Forrest city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Forrest city.
  • In Forrest city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 16.2% in Hanover park.
  • More residents in Hanover park have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 17.7% in Forrest city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.