Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Hanover park | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,376 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $88,460 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanover park vs Fairfield
- In Hanover park, the population is higher at 36,376, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover park at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 6% in Hanover park.
- The unemployment rate in Hanover park is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover park vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover park | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 8 |
| White | 17 | 73 |
| Asian | 20 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs Fairfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hanover park and Fairfield at 8%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
- The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 9% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover park at 15% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hanover park and Fairfield at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover park | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 16.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 30.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield at 20.1% versus 16.1% in Hanover park.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Hanover park.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover park | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (758) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (5,894) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 21.1% (7,688) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (6,537) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Hanover park have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 18.0% in Hanover park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.