Environment details: Hannibal MO
decent quality, generally safe for use.
Environment details: South gate CA
Average quality; urban challenges present.
Compare Environment: Hannibal MO vs South gate CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Hannibal | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | decent quality, generally safe for use. | Average quality; urban challenges present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.68 | 3.2 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 28 | 238 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Hannibal vs South gate
- Water quality is rated higher in Hannibal at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in South gate.
- South gate has a better median air quality index at 3.0 compared to 2.0 in Hannibal.
- Air quality is better in South gate with an average index of 3.2 compared to 1.68 in Hannibal.
- South gate experiences more days with poor air quality at 238 compared to 28 in Hannibal.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.