Demographics details for Hannibal, MO vs New iberia, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hannibal, MO vs New iberia, LA.
Data | Hannibal | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,938 | 27,473 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $52,746 | $47,108 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Hannibal vs New iberia
- The population in New iberia is higher at 27,473, compared to 16,938 in Hannibal.
- Residents in Hannibal have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 34.9 years in New iberia.
- Hannibal has a higher median income of $52,746 compared to $47,108 in New iberia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hannibal at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in New iberia.
- The poverty level is higher in New iberia at 20%, compared to 12% in Hannibal.
- New iberia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Hannibal.
Demographics
Demographics Hannibal vs New iberia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hannibal | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 46 |
White | 87 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hannibal vs New iberia
- In New iberia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 8% in Hannibal.
- Hannibal has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 42% in New iberia.
- In New iberia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hannibal.
- New iberia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Hannibal.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New iberia at 6%, compared to 3% in Hannibal.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hannibal and New iberia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hannibal | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 21.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.7% |
Depression | 25.4% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 26.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 45.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hannibal vs New iberia
- In New iberia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.3% in Hannibal.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New iberia at 27.0% versus 25.4% in Hannibal.
- New iberia has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 23.7% in Hannibal.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hannibal at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in New iberia.
- New iberia has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 42.0% in Hannibal.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New iberia at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Hannibal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hannibal | New iberia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (183) | 1.3% (345) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (3,780) | 21.7% (5,975) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (2,643) | 18.7% (5,143) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (2,536) | 10.7% (2,944) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hannibal vs New iberia
- In New iberia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Hannibal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hannibal hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 21.7% in New iberia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New iberia at 18.7%, compared to 15.6% in Hannibal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hannibal hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 10.7% in New iberia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.