Demographics details for Hannibal, MO vs Eastman, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hannibal, MO vs Eastman, GA.
| Data | Hannibal | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,938 | 5,616 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $52,746 | $41,213 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Hannibal vs Eastman
- In Hannibal, the population is higher at 16,938, compared to 5,616 in Eastman.
- The median age is the same in both Hannibal and Eastman at 38.5 years.
- Hannibal has a higher median income of $52,746 compared to $41,213 in Eastman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hannibal at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Eastman.
- The poverty level is higher in Eastman at 21%, compared to 12% in Hannibal.
- Eastman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Hannibal.
Demographics
Demographics Hannibal vs Eastman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hannibal | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 22 |
| White | 87 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hannibal vs Eastman
- In Eastman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 8% in Hannibal.
- Hannibal has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 69% in Eastman.
- The Asian population is larger in Hannibal at 1% compared to 0% in Eastman.
- Eastman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Hannibal.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hannibal at 3% compared to 1% in Eastman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hannibal and Eastman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hannibal | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hannibal vs Eastman
- More residents in Hannibal report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.6% in Eastman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hannibal at 25.4% compared to 22.1% in Eastman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hannibal at 23.7% compared to 21.0% in Eastman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hannibal at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Eastman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hannibal at 42.0% compared to 37.5% in Eastman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eastman at 22.0% compared to 17.0% in Hannibal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hannibal | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (183) | 0.8% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (3,780) | 16.8% (942) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (2,643) | 13.4% (750) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (2,536) | 14.7% (824) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hannibal vs Eastman
- A higher percentage of residents in Hannibal have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Eastman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hannibal hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 16.8% in Eastman.
- More residents in Hannibal have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Eastman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hannibal hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 14.7% in Eastman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.