Demographics details for Hancock, NH vs Fillmore, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, NH vs Fillmore, NY.
Data | Hancock | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,654 | 652 |
Median Age | 50.0 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $85,000 | $70,677 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Fillmore
- In Hancock, the population is higher at 1,654, compared to 652 in Fillmore.
- Residents in Hancock have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 45.2 years in Fillmore.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $70,677 in Fillmore.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hancock at 60.0% compared to 48.0% in Fillmore.
- The poverty level is higher in Fillmore at 9%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- Fillmore has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Fillmore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hancock | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 99 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Fillmore
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hancock and Fillmore at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fillmore at 99% compared to 95% in Hancock.
- The Asian population is larger in Hancock at 2% compared to 0% in Fillmore.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Hancock and Fillmore at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hancock at 3% compared to 1% in Fillmore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hancock and Fillmore at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hancock | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.7% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 25.9% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Fillmore
- In Fillmore, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fillmore at 25.9% versus 0.0% in Hancock.
- Fillmore has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fillmore at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Fillmore has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fillmore at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hancock | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 21.6% (141) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (6) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 21.8% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Fillmore
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Hancock and Fillmore at 0.0%.
- In Fillmore, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fillmore at 0.9%, compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- In Fillmore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.