Demographics details for Hancock, NH vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, NH vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Hancock | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,654 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 50.0 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $85,000 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 1,654 in Hancock.
- Residents in Hancock have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $84,132 in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hancock at 60.0% compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hancock | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 51 |
| White | 95 | 11 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 0% in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- Both Hancock and Cedar hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 3% in Hancock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hancock and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hancock | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar hill at 20.5% versus 0.0% in Hancock.
- Cedar hill has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hancock | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- In Cedar hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar hill at 10.2%, compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.