Demographics details for Hancock, MN vs Lawson, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, MN vs Lawson, MO.
Data | Hancock | Lawson |
---|---|---|
Population | 857 | 2,525 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 33.3 years |
Median Income | $67,019 | $61,929 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Lawson
- The population in Lawson is higher at 2,525, compared to 857 in Hancock.
- Residents in Hancock have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 33.3 years in Lawson.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019 compared to $61,929 in Lawson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hancock at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Lawson.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawson at 8%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hancock and Lawson at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Lawson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hancock | Lawson |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 96 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Lawson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Lawson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawson at 96% compared to 87% in Hancock.
- The Asian population is larger in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Lawson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hancock at 6% compared to 2% in Lawson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hancock at 4% compared to 2% in Lawson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Lawson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hancock | Lawson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.4% |
Depression | 24.1% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Lawson
- In Lawson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawson at 25.4% versus 24.1% in Hancock.
- Lawson has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 18.3% in Lawson.
- Lawson has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 33.6% in Hancock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lawson at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hancock | Lawson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (4) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (179) | 25.5% (643) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (51) | 15.5% (392) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (62) | 9.6% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Lawson
- A higher percentage of residents in Hancock have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Lawson.
- In Lawson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 20.9% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawson at 15.5%, compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- In Lawson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.