Demographics details for Hancock, MN vs Crosbyton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, MN vs Crosbyton, TX.
| Data | Hancock | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 857 | 1,461 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $67,019 | $47,083 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Crosbyton
- The population in Crosbyton is higher at 1,461, compared to 857 in Hancock.
- The median age in Crosbyton is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.9 years in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Hancock.
- The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- The unemployment rate in Hancock is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hancock | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 6 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- The Asian population is larger in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 6% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 4% in Hancock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hancock | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hancock at 24.1% compared to 23.6% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 33.6% in Hancock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hancock | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (4) | 2.1% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (179) | 24.6% (359) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (51) | 37.1% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (62) | 8.8% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Hancock.
- In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 20.9% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- In Crosbyton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.