Demographics details for Hancock, MN vs Bridgeport, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, MN vs Bridgeport, CT.
| Data | Hancock | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 857 | 148,377 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $67,019 | $54,440 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 857 in Hancock.
- The median age in Bridgeport is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.9 years in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019 compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hancock at 40.0% compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 12%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hancock | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 22 |
| White | 87 | 26 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Hancock.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 6% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bridgeport at 9%, compared to 4% in Hancock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hancock | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hancock at 24.1% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hancock at 33.6% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hancock | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (4) | 2.5% (3,659) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (179) | 18.7% (27,806) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (51) | 23.9% (35,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (62) | 16.8% (24,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hancock hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.