Demographics details for Hancock, MN vs Abilene, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hancock, MN vs Abilene, TX.
| Data | Hancock | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 857 | 127,385 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $67,019 | $59,254 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hancock vs Abilene
- The population in Abilene is higher at 127,385, compared to 857 in Hancock.
- Residents in Hancock have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019 compared to $59,254 in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hancock at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Abilene.
- The poverty level is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 5% in Hancock.
- Abilene has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Hancock vs Abilene provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hancock | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 87 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hancock vs Abilene
- In Abilene, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 49% in Abilene.
- In Abilene, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hancock.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 6% in Hancock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 4% in Hancock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hancock at 1% compared to 0% in Abilene.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hancock | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hancock vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hancock at 24.1% compared to 22.8% in Abilene.
- Abilene has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 18.3% in Abilene.
- Abilene has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 33.6% in Hancock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Abilene at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hancock | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (4) | 0.9% (1,096) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (179) | 13.7% (17,400) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (51) | 13.7% (17,433) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (62) | 16.0% (20,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hancock vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hancock hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Abilene at 13.7%, compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- In Abilene, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.