Demographics details for Hanapepe, HI vs Tuscaloosa, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanapepe, HI vs Tuscaloosa, AL.
| Data | Hanapepe | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,242 | 110,602 |
| Median Age | 43.1 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,385 | $47,257 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanapepe vs Tuscaloosa
- The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 2,242 in Hanapepe.
- Residents in Hanapepe have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
- Hanapepe has a higher median income of $88,385 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanapepe at 43.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 8% in Hanapepe.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in Hanapepe.
Demographics
Demographics Hanapepe vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanapepe | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 41 |
| White | 28 | 49 |
| Asian | 49 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hanapepe vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 0% in Hanapepe.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscaloosa at 49% compared to 28% in Hanapepe.
- The Asian population is larger in Hanapepe at 49% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Hanapepe and Tuscaloosa at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hanapepe at 19% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hanapepe and Tuscaloosa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanapepe | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 13.8% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 23.2% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanapepe vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.9% in Hanapepe.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscaloosa at 21.9% versus 13.8% in Hanapepe.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 15.8% in Hanapepe.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanapepe at 17.2% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 23.2% in Hanapepe.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hanapepe at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanapepe | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 42.2% (946) | 12.5% (13,878) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (174) | 6.1% (6,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (286) | 20.3% (22,425) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanapepe vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Hanapepe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanapepe hold a high school diploma at 42.2% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents in Hanapepe have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 6.1% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 12.8% in Hanapepe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.