Demographics details for Hammonton, NJ vs Little falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hammonton, NJ vs Little falls, MN.
Data | Hammonton | Little falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,833 | 9,094 |
Median Age | 46.2 years | 40.8 years |
Median Income | $79,747 | $44,455 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hammonton vs Little falls
- In Hammonton, the population is higher at 14,833, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
- Residents in Hammonton have a higher median age of 46.2 years compared to 40.8 years in Little falls.
- Hammonton has a higher median income of $79,747 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hammonton at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 10% in Hammonton.
- The unemployment rate in Hammonton is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Little falls.
Demographics
Demographics Hammonton vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hammonton | Little falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 67 | 95 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 25 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hammonton vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hammonton at 2% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 67% in Hammonton.
- Both Hammonton and Little falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hammonton at 25% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hammonton at 5% compared to 3% in Little falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hammonton and Little falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hammonton | Little falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 10.9% |
Depression | 21.9% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 20.6% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hammonton vs Little falls
- In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in Hammonton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 21.9% in Hammonton.
- Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.5% in Hammonton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 19.9% in Hammonton.
- Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 34.1% in Hammonton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Hammonton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hammonton | Little falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (189) | 0.7% (63) |
High School Diploma | 24.8% (3,684) | 25.4% (2,308) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (2,184) | 11.7% (1,063) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (3,206) | 14.3% (1,301) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hammonton vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Hammonton have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 24.8% in Hammonton.
- More residents in Hammonton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hammonton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.