Demographics details for Hammonton, NJ vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hammonton, NJ vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Hammonton | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,833 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 46.2 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $79,747 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hammonton vs Chandler
- In Hammonton, the population is higher at 14,833, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Hammonton have a higher median age of 46.2 years compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
- Hammonton has a higher median income of $79,747 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hammonton at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 10% in Hammonton.
- The unemployment rate in Hammonton is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Hammonton vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hammonton | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 67 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Hammonton vs Chandler
- In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Hammonton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 67% in Hammonton.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hammonton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hammonton at 25% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 5% in Hammonton.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Hammonton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hammonton | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hammonton vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Hammonton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 21.9% in Hammonton.
- Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 15.5% in Hammonton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hammonton at 19.9% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 34.1% in Hammonton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Hammonton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hammonton | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (189) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.8% (3,684) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (2,184) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (3,206) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hammonton vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Hammonton have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hammonton hold a high school diploma at 24.8% compared to 23.9% in Chandler.
- More residents in Hammonton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hammonton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.