Demographics details for Hagerstown, MD vs Clifton, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hagerstown, MD vs Clifton, NJ.
Data | Hagerstown | Clifton |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,701 | 88,709 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $48,481 | $94,179 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Hagerstown vs Clifton
- The population in Clifton is higher at 88,709, compared to 43,701 in Hagerstown.
- The median age in Clifton is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 35.9 years in Hagerstown.
- Clifton has a higher median income of $94,179, compared to $48,481 in Hagerstown.
- In Clifton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 29.0% in Hagerstown.
- Hagerstown has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Clifton.
- Clifton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.9% in Hagerstown.
Demographics
Demographics Hagerstown vs Clifton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hagerstown | Clifton |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 5 |
White | 56 | 34 |
Asian | 2 | 9 |
Hispanic | 10 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hagerstown vs Clifton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hagerstown at 21% compared to 5% in Clifton.
- Hagerstown has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 34% in Clifton.
- In Clifton, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Hagerstown.
- Clifton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 10% in Hagerstown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton at 13%, compared to 11% in Hagerstown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hagerstown and Clifton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hagerstown | Clifton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.1% |
Depression | 25.7% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 21.9% | 12.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hagerstown vs Clifton
- More residents in Hagerstown report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.4% in Clifton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hagerstown at 25.7% compared to 16.7% in Clifton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hagerstown at 21.9% compared to 12.0% in Clifton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clifton at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Hagerstown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hagerstown at 42.7% compared to 28.2% in Clifton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hagerstown at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Clifton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hagerstown | Clifton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (496) | 2.2% (1,937) |
High School Diploma | 20.5% (8,968) | 21.1% (18,683) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (7,464) | 14.9% (13,251) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (5,726) | 24.9% (22,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hagerstown vs Clifton
- In Clifton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.1% in Hagerstown.
- In Clifton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 20.5% in Hagerstown.
- More residents in Hagerstown have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Clifton.
- In Clifton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.9% compared to 13.1% in Hagerstown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.