Demographics details for Haddon heights, NJ vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Haddon heights, NJ vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Haddon heights | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,484 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $117,556 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Haddon heights vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 7,484 in Haddon heights.
- Residents in Haddon heights have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $117,556 in Haddon heights.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Haddon heights.
- The poverty level is identical in both Haddon heights and Parker at 5%.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Haddon heights.
Demographics
Demographics Haddon heights vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Haddon heights | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Haddon heights vs Parker
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Haddon heights and Parker at 2%.
- Haddon heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Haddon heights.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Haddon heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 2% in Haddon heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Haddon heights and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Haddon heights | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 26.1% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Haddon heights vs Parker
- More residents in Haddon heights report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Haddon heights at 23.0% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Haddon heights at 11.8% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Haddon heights at 20.3% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Haddon heights at 26.1% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Haddon heights at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Haddon heights | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (70) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (843) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (409) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (2,863) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Haddon heights vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Haddon heights have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haddon heights hold a high school diploma at 11.3% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Haddon heights have less than a high school education at 5.5% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haddon heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 32.8% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.