Demographics details for Hackensack, NJ vs South gate, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hackensack, NJ vs South gate, CA.

Data Hackensack South gate
Population 45,633 90,926
Median Age 40.0 years 33.7 years
Median Income $79,133 $67,188
Married Families 33.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 9% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 6.1

Population Comparison: Hackensack vs South gate

  • The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 45,633 in Hackensack.
  • Residents in Hackensack have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
  • Hackensack has a higher median income of $79,133 compared to $67,188 in South gate.
  • In South gate, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Hackensack.
  • The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 9% in Hackensack.
  • South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.0% in Hackensack.

Demographics

Demographics Hackensack vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hackensack South gate
Black 20 1
White 17 -21
Asian 13 1
Hispanic 37 97
Two or More Races 13 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Hackensack vs South gate

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hackensack at 20% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • Hackensack has a higher percentage of White residents at 17% compared to -21% in South gate.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hackensack at 13% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 37% in Hackensack.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 13% in Hackensack.
  • In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hackensack.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hackensack South gate
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 14.9%
Depression 15.7% 16.3%
Smoking 13.5% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 14.5%
Obesity 30.5% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hackensack vs South gate

  • In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.2% in Hackensack.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South gate at 16.3% versus 15.7% in Hackensack.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hackensack at 13.5% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hackensack at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
  • South gate has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 30.5% in Hackensack.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hackensack at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hackensack South gate
No Schooling 3.3% (1,520) 4.6% (4,160)
High School Diploma 17.2% (7,861) 14.9% (13,536)
Less than High School 19.0% (8,680) 53.3% (48,481)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (14,527) 7.5% (6,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Hackensack vs South gate

  • In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 3.3% in Hackensack.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hackensack hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 19.0% in Hackensack.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hackensack hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 7.5% in South gate.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.