Demographics details for Hackensack, NJ vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hackensack, NJ vs Mcdonough, GA.
Data | Hackensack | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Population | 45,633 | 30,340 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 31.0 years |
Median Income | $79,133 | $77,804 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Hackensack vs Mcdonough
- In Hackensack, the population is higher at 45,633, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- Residents in Hackensack have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Hackensack has a higher median income of $79,133 compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hackensack at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 9% in Hackensack.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 5.0% in Hackensack.
Demographics
Demographics Hackensack vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hackensack | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 70 |
White | 17 | 14 |
Asian | 13 | 2 |
Hispanic | 37 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hackensack vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 20% in Hackensack.
- Hackensack has a higher percentage of White residents at 17% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- The Asian population is larger in Hackensack at 13% compared to 2% in Mcdonough.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hackensack at 37% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hackensack at 13% compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hackensack and Mcdonough at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hackensack | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 15.7% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 30.5% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hackensack vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.2% in Hackensack.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcdonough at 19.6% versus 15.7% in Hackensack.
- Mcdonough has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 13.5% in Hackensack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hackensack at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 30.5% in Hackensack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hackensack at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hackensack | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.3% (1,520) | 0.7% (221) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (7,861) | 14.8% (4,501) |
Less than High School | 19.0% (8,680) | 4.9% (1,500) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (14,527) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hackensack vs Mcdonough
- A higher percentage of residents in Hackensack have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hackensack hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- More residents in Hackensack have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hackensack hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.