Demographics details for Hackberry, LA vs Bozeman, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hackberry, LA vs Bozeman, MT.
| Data | Hackberry | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 988 | 56,123 |
| Median Age | 52.2 years | 28.2 years |
| Median Income | $98,056 | $74,113 |
| Married Families | 64.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Hackberry vs Bozeman
- The population in Bozeman is higher at 56,123, compared to 988 in Hackberry.
- Residents in Hackberry have a higher median age of 52.2 years compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Hackberry has a higher median income of $98,056 compared to $74,113 in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hackberry at 64.0% compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- Hackberry has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- The unemployment rate in Hackberry is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Hackberry vs Bozeman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hackberry | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 100 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hackberry vs Bozeman
- In Bozeman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- Hackberry has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 86% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hackberry.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bozeman at 5%, compared to 0% in Hackberry.
- In Bozeman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hackberry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hackberry | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 24.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hackberry vs Bozeman
- More residents in Hackberry report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hackberry at 29.8% compared to 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hackberry at 23.3% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 19.9% in Hackberry.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hackberry at 37.1% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hackberry at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hackberry | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 0.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 21.8% (215) | 5.7% (3,187) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (134) | 2.3% (1,316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (116) | 35.7% (20,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hackberry vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of residents in Hackberry have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hackberry hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- More residents in Hackberry have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 11.7% in Hackberry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.