Demographics details for Guymon, OK vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Guymon, OK vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Guymon | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,378 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 30.8 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $55,526 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Guymon vs Kings mountain
- In Guymon, the population is higher at 12,378, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 30.8 years in Guymon.
- Guymon has a higher median income of $55,526 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Guymon at 32.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is identical in both Guymon and Kings mountain at 11%.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Guymon.
Demographics
Demographics Guymon vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Guymon | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 25 |
White | 13 | 68 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 57 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Guymon vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 10% in Guymon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 13% in Guymon.
- Both Guymon and Kings mountain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Guymon at 57% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Guymon at 16% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Guymon at 2% compared to 0% in Kings mountain.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Guymon | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.1% |
Depression | 22.3% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 45.8% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Guymon vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Guymon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 22.3% in Guymon.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 20.6% in Guymon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 12.8% in Guymon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Guymon at 45.8% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Guymon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Guymon | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (227) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (1,853) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 35.4% (4,377) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (1,562) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Guymon vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Guymon have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 15.0% in Guymon.
- More residents in Guymon have less than a high school education at 35.4% compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Guymon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.