Demographics details for Guffey, CO vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Guffey, CO vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Guffey | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 62.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $24,919 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 100.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Guffey vs Clinton
- The population in Clinton is higher at 7,554, compared to 29 in Guffey.
- Residents in Guffey have a higher median age of 62.4 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher median income of $38,350, compared to $24,919 in Guffey.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Guffey at 100.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 0% in Guffey.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Guffey.
Demographics
Demographics Guffey vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Guffey | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 38 |
| White | 100 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Guffey vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in Guffey.
- Guffey has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Guffey.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Guffey.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clinton at 4%, compared to 0% in Guffey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Guffey and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Guffey | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Guffey vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.8% in Guffey.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 22.9% in Guffey.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 17.1% in Guffey.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Guffey.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 28.5% in Guffey.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Guffey.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Guffey | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 100.0% (29) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Guffey vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Guffey.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Guffey.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 0.0% in Guffey.
- A higher percentage of residents in Guffey hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 100.0% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.