Demographics details for Groves, TX vs Fedscreek, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Groves, TX vs Fedscreek, KY.
| Data | Groves | Fedscreek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,798 | 3,563 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $64,737 | $37,431 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Groves vs Fedscreek
- In Groves, the population is higher at 16,798, compared to 3,563 in Fedscreek.
- Residents in Groves have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 38.2 years in Fedscreek.
- Groves has a higher median income of $64,737 compared to $37,431 in Fedscreek.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Groves at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Fedscreek.
- The poverty level is higher in Fedscreek at 15%, compared to 10% in Groves.
- Fedscreek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.2% in Groves.
Demographics
Demographics Groves vs Fedscreek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Groves | Fedscreek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 44 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Groves vs Fedscreek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Groves at 9% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fedscreek at 94% compared to 44% in Groves.
- The Asian population is larger in Groves at 7% compared to 0% in Fedscreek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Groves at 26% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Groves at 14% compared to 4% in Fedscreek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Groves and Fedscreek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Groves | Fedscreek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Groves vs Fedscreek
- More residents in Groves report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Groves at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Groves at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Groves at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Groves at 34.8% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fedscreek at 33.0% compared to 15.0% in Groves.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Groves | Fedscreek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (638) | 3.6% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (3,039) | 22.2% (791) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (2,731) | 42.4% (1,510) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (1,655) | 6.9% (245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Groves vs Fedscreek
- A higher percentage of residents in Groves have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 3.6% in Fedscreek.
- In Fedscreek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 18.1% in Groves.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fedscreek at 42.4%, compared to 16.3% in Groves.
- A higher percentage of residents in Groves hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 6.9% in Fedscreek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.