Demographics details for Grove, OK vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grove, OK vs Forest lake, MN.
| Data | Grove | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,215 | 20,857 |
| Median Age | 46.9 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $56,469 | $91,157 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Grove vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 7,215 in Grove.
- Residents in Grove have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $56,469 in Grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grove at 44.0% compared to 42.0% in Forest lake.
- Grove has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Grove is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Grove vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grove | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 70 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grove vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 70% in Grove.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grove at 7% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grove at 11% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grove at 11% compared to 0% in Forest lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grove | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grove vs Forest lake
- More residents in Grove report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grove at 25.4% compared to 24.1% in Forest lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grove at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 15.1% in Grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grove at 38.3% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grove at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grove | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (20) | 0.5% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (1,068) | 14.6% (3,055) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (832) | 7.7% (1,615) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (1,463) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grove vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- More residents in Grove have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 20.3% in Grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.