Demographics details for Grove, OK vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grove, OK vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Grove | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,215 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 46.9 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,469 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Grove vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 7,215 in Grove.
- Residents in Grove have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $56,469 in Grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grove at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- Grove has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Grove.
Demographics
Demographics Grove vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grove | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 51 |
| White | 70 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grove vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 1% in Grove.
- Grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Grove.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grove at 11% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grove at 11% compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grove | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grove vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Grove report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grove at 25.4% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grove at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 15.1% in Grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grove at 38.3% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grove at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grove | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (20) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (1,068) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (832) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (1,463) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grove vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Grove have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.