Demographics details for Grove city, OH vs Sweetwater, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grove city, OH vs Sweetwater, TX.

Data Grove city Sweetwater
Population 42,233 10,408
Median Age 40.6 years 35.7 years
Median Income $84,765 $44,306
Married Families 45.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 7% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 5.4

Population Comparison: Grove city vs Sweetwater

  • In Grove city, the population is higher at 42,233, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
  • Residents in Grove city have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
  • Grove city has a higher median income of $84,765 compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Grove city at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 7% in Grove city.
  • Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.3% in Grove city.

Demographics

Demographics Grove city vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grove city Sweetwater
Black 4 6
White 86 34
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 46
Two or More Races 4 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Grove city vs Sweetwater

  • In Sweetwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Grove city.
  • Grove city has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
  • The Asian population is larger in Grove city at 3% compared to 0% in Sweetwater.
  • Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 3% in Grove city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sweetwater at 13%, compared to 4% in Grove city.
  • In Sweetwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Grove city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grove city Sweetwater
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 14.3%
Depression 25.1% 24.2%
Smoking 16.5% 20.3%
Binge Drinking 20.7% 17.3%
Obesity 33.1% 38.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grove city vs Sweetwater

  • In Sweetwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.0% in Grove city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Grove city at 25.1% compared to 24.2% in Sweetwater.
  • Sweetwater has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 16.5% in Grove city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grove city at 20.7% compared to 17.3% in Sweetwater.
  • Sweetwater has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 33.1% in Grove city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Grove city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grove city Sweetwater
No Schooling 0.7% (302) 1.9% (194)
High School Diploma 18.7% (7,916) 16.0% (1,666)
Less than High School 8.5% (3,598) 23.1% (2,408)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.9% (9,679) 7.0% (733)

Education Levels Comparison: Grove city vs Sweetwater

  • In Sweetwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Grove city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grove city hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 8.5% in Grove city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grove city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.