Demographics details for Grove city, OH vs Foster, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grove city, OH vs Foster, OK.
| Data | Grove city | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,233 | 247 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $84,765 | $68,871 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Grove city vs Foster
- In Grove city, the population is higher at 42,233, compared to 247 in Foster.
- Residents in Grove city have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 38.8 years in Foster.
- Grove city has a higher median income of $84,765 compared to $68,871 in Foster.
- In Foster, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Grove city.
- The poverty level is higher in Foster at 12%, compared to 7% in Grove city.
- The unemployment rate in Grove city is higher at 4.3%, compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Grove city vs Foster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grove city | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 73 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Grove city vs Foster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grove city at 4% compared to 0% in Foster.
- Grove city has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 73% in Foster.
- The Asian population is larger in Grove city at 3% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grove city at 3% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Foster at 20%, compared to 4% in Grove city.
- In Foster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Grove city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grove city | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grove city vs Foster
- In Foster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.0% in Grove city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grove city at 25.1% compared to 24.7% in Foster.
- Foster has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.5% in Grove city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grove city at 20.7% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Foster has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 33.1% in Grove city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Foster at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Grove city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grove city | Foster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (7,916) | 30.4% (75) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (3,598) | 8.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (9,679) | 22.3% (55) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grove city vs Foster
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove city have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- In Foster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 18.7% in Grove city.
- More residents in Grove city have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 22.3% in Foster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.