Demographics details for Groom, TX vs Boomer, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Groom, TX vs Boomer, NC.
| Data | Groom | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 548 | 1,213 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $51,944 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Groom vs Boomer
- The population in Boomer is higher at 1,213, compared to 548 in Groom.
- The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 46.0 years in Groom.
- Groom has a higher median income of $51,944 compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- In Boomer, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Groom.
- The poverty level is identical in both Groom and Boomer at 12%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Groom and Boomer at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Groom vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Groom | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 96 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Groom vs Boomer
- In Boomer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Groom.
- Groom has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 91% in Boomer.
- Both Groom and Boomer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Groom at 3% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Boomer at 2%, compared to 1% in Groom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Groom and Boomer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Groom | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Groom vs Boomer
- More residents in Groom report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Groom at 25.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Groom at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Groom at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Groom at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Groom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Groom | Boomer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (122) | 21.2% (257) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (60) | 25.9% (314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (60) | 9.6% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Groom vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of residents in Groom have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Groom hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 21.2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 10.9% in Groom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Groom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.