Demographics details for Grinnell, KS vs Spring park, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grinnell, KS vs Spring park, MN.
| Data | Grinnell | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 254 | 1,663 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 55.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,042 | $48,684 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Grinnell vs Spring park
- The population in Spring park is higher at 1,663, compared to 254 in Grinnell.
- The median age in Spring park is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 37.9 years in Grinnell.
- Grinnell has a higher median income of $56,042 compared to $48,684 in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grinnell at 58.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
- Grinnell has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Spring park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Grinnell and Spring park at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Grinnell vs Spring park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grinnell | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 100 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Grinnell vs Spring park
- In Spring park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- Grinnell has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 82% in Spring park.
- In Spring park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Grinnell.
- Spring park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spring park at 3%, compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- In Spring park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Grinnell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grinnell | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 22.5% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grinnell vs Spring park
- More residents in Grinnell report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.4% in Spring park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spring park at 23.7% versus 20.1% in Grinnell.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grinnell at 17.6% compared to 11.7% in Spring park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 20.4% in Grinnell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grinnell at 38.3% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Grinnell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grinnell | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (48) | 27.8% (463) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (42) | 12.0% (200) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (43) | 29.1% (484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grinnell vs Spring park
- In Spring park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Grinnell.
- In Spring park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.8% compared to 18.9% in Grinnell.
- More residents in Grinnell have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 12.0% in Spring park.
- In Spring park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.1% compared to 16.9% in Grinnell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.