Demographics details for Grinnell, KS vs Kingsland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grinnell, KS vs Kingsland, TX.
Data | Grinnell | Kingsland |
---|---|---|
Population | 254 | 7,075 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 52.3 years |
Median Income | $56,042 | $54,366 |
Married Families | 58.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grinnell vs Kingsland
- The population in Kingsland is higher at 7,075, compared to 254 in Grinnell.
- The median age in Kingsland is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 37.9 years in Grinnell.
- Grinnell has a higher median income of $56,042 compared to $54,366 in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grinnell at 58.0% compared to 43.0% in Kingsland.
- Grinnell has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Grinnell.
Demographics
Demographics Grinnell vs Kingsland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grinnell | Kingsland |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 100 | 67 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 19 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grinnell vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- Grinnell has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 67% in Kingsland.
- In Kingsland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Grinnell.
- Kingsland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingsland at 12%, compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Grinnell and Kingsland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grinnell | Kingsland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 20.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 14.1% |
Depression | 20.1% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 38.3% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grinnell vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 15.1% in Grinnell.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kingsland at 26.8% versus 20.1% in Grinnell.
- Kingsland has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 17.6% in Grinnell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grinnell at 20.4% compared to 17.9% in Kingsland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grinnell at 38.3% compared to 38.2% in Kingsland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kingsland at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Grinnell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grinnell | Kingsland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (94) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (48) | 19.3% (1,363) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (42) | 22.2% (1,568) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (43) | 18.7% (1,325) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grinnell vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Grinnell.
- In Kingsland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kingsland at 22.2%, compared to 16.5% in Grinnell.
- In Kingsland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 16.9% in Grinnell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.