Demographics details for Griffin, IN vs San rafael, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, IN vs San rafael, CA.
| Data | Griffin | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 | 59,971 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 44.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $113,839 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs San rafael
- The population in San rafael is higher at 59,971, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in San rafael is higher at 44.0 years, compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839, compared to $61,250 in Griffin.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Griffin and San rafael at 39.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in San rafael at 9%, compared to 8% in Griffin.
- San rafael has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs San rafael provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 98 | 49 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs San rafael
- In San rafael, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Griffin.
- San rafael has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San rafael at 9%, compared to 2% in Griffin.
- In San rafael, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs San rafael
- More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
- Depression is more prevalent in Griffin at 26.3% compared to 17.5% in San rafael.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 18.5% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
- Binge drinking is more common in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 37.8% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
- Disability percentages are higher in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 2.9% (1,761) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (24) | 7.4% (4,459) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (14) | 21.6% (12,927) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (17) | 36.5% (21,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs San rafael
- In San rafael, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.4% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San rafael at 21.6%, compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- In San rafael, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.