Demographics details for Griffin, IN vs New prague, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, IN vs New prague, MN.
| Data | Griffin | New prague |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 | 8,277 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $101,579 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs New prague
- The population in New prague is higher at 8,277, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in New prague is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- New prague has a higher median income of $101,579, compared to $61,250 in Griffin.
- In New prague, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in New prague.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in New prague.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs New prague provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | New prague |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs New prague
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Griffin and New prague at 0%.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 91% in New prague.
- In New prague, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Griffin.
- New prague has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New prague at 4%, compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Griffin and New prague at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | New prague |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs New prague
- More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in New prague.
- Depression is more prevalent in Griffin at 26.3% compared to 22.3% in New prague.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 18.5% compared to 14.7% in New prague.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New prague at 20.8% compared to 17.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 37.8% compared to 34.5% in New prague.
- Disability percentages are higher in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in New prague.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | New prague |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 0.3% (26) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (24) | 14.5% (1,198) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (14) | 5.2% (427) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (17) | 18.2% (1,509) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs New prague
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in New prague.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in New prague.
- More residents in Griffin have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 5.2% in New prague.
- In New prague, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.