Demographics details for Griffin, IN vs New bern, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, IN vs New bern, NC.
| Data | Griffin | New bern |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 | 31,539 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $55,673 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs New bern
- The population in New bern is higher at 31,539, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in New bern is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $55,673 in New bern.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in New bern.
- The poverty level is identical in both Griffin and New bern at 8%.
- New bern has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs New bern provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | New bern |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 31 |
| White | 98 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs New bern
- In New bern, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 52% in New bern.
- In New bern, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Griffin.
- New bern has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New bern at 5%, compared to 2% in Griffin.
- In New bern, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | New bern |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs New bern
- More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in New bern.
- Depression is more prevalent in Griffin at 26.3% compared to 23.1% in New bern.
- New bern has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 15.7% in New bern.
- New bern has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Griffin and New bern at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | New bern |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 0.7% (226) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (24) | 14.6% (4,607) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (14) | 10.3% (3,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (17) | 20.0% (6,293) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs New bern
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in New bern.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in New bern.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New bern at 10.3%, compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- In New bern, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.