Demographics details for Griffin, IN vs Middleport, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, IN vs Middleport, OH.
| Data | Griffin | Middleport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 | 2,180 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $36,343 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Middleport
- The population in Middleport is higher at 2,180, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in Middleport is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $36,343 in Middleport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 39.0% compared to 28.0% in Middleport.
- The poverty level is higher in Middleport at 10%, compared to 8% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Griffin and Middleport at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Middleport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Middleport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 98 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Middleport
- In Middleport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 91% in Middleport.
- Both Griffin and Middleport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Griffin and Middleport at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Middleport at 7%, compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Griffin and Middleport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Middleport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 30.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Middleport
- In Middleport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.2% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middleport at 27.5% versus 26.3% in Griffin.
- Middleport has a higher smoking rate at 30.0% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in Middleport.
- Middleport has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middleport at 29.0% compared to 14.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Middleport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 1.7% (36) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (24) | 23.5% (512) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (14) | 19.8% (432) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (17) | 7.8% (169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Middleport
- In Middleport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in Griffin.
- In Middleport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middleport at 19.8%, compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 7.8% in Middleport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.