Demographics details for Griffin, IN vs Centralia, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, IN vs Centralia, WA.
| Data | Griffin | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 | 18,773 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $50,422 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Centralia
- The population in Centralia is higher at 18,773, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 39.0% compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 14%, compared to 8% in Griffin.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 98 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 70% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Griffin.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 11%, compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Griffin and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.2% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 26.3% in Griffin.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 37.8% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 1.1% (214) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (24) | 17.6% (3,312) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (14) | 19.3% (3,617) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (17) | 11.6% (2,187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 19.3%, compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.