Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Woodbury, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Woodbury, TN.
| Data | Griffin | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,693 | 2,804 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,047 | $51,528 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Woodbury
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 2,804 in Woodbury.
- The median age in Woodbury is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Woodbury has a higher median income of $51,528, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 26.0% compared to 25.0% in Woodbury.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Woodbury.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Woodbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 4 |
| White | 36 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbury at 89% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 3% in Woodbury.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 30.2% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Woodbury
- In Woodbury, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodbury at 30.2% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Woodbury has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 22.4% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodbury at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 38.8% compared to 35.6% in Woodbury.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 28.8% (807) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 17.9% (502) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 9.7% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.7% in Woodbury.
- In Woodbury, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 22.6% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodbury at 17.9%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 9.7% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.