Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Turtle creek, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Turtle creek, PA.
Data | Griffin | Turtle creek |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,693 | 4,987 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $42,047 | $42,344 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Turtle creek
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 4,987 in Turtle creek.
- The median age in Turtle creek is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Turtle creek has a higher median income of $42,344, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Turtle creek.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Turtle creek.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Griffin and Turtle creek at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Turtle creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Griffin | Turtle creek |
---|---|---|
Black | 52 | 26 |
White | 36 | 60 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Turtle creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 26% in Turtle creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Turtle creek at 60% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- Both Griffin and Turtle creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 2% in Turtle creek.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Turtle creek at 11%, compared to 5% in Griffin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Turtle creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Griffin | Turtle creek |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.5% |
Depression | 19.7% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 38.8% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Turtle creek
- In Turtle creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Turtle creek at 24.6% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Turtle creek has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 22.4% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Turtle creek at 18.8% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 38.8% compared to 38.0% in Turtle creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Turtle creek at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Griffin | Turtle creek |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 2.0% (98) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 20.2% (1,007) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 19.0% (948) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 8.7% (433) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Turtle creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 2.0% in Turtle creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 20.2% in Turtle creek.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Turtle creek at 19.0%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 8.7% in Turtle creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.