Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Raven, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Raven, VA.
| Data | Griffin | Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,693 | 2,065 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 46.2 years |
| Median Income | $42,047 | $36,613 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Raven
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 2,065 in Raven.
- The median age in Raven is higher at 46.2 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $42,047 compared to $36,613 in Raven.
- In Raven, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is identical in both Griffin and Raven at 15%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Griffin and Raven at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Raven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | Data is updating |
| White | 36 | 99 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Raven
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 0% in Raven.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Raven at 99% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Raven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 0% in Raven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 1% in Raven.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Raven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 22.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 16.7% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 30.4% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 27.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Raven
- In Raven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Raven at 30.4% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Raven has a higher smoking rate at 27.3% compared to 22.4% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Raven at 16.2% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Raven has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Raven at 26.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Raven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 0.5% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 18.8% (388) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 22.5% (464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 10.1% (208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Raven
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Raven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 18.8% in Raven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Raven at 22.5%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.1% in Raven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.