Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Irving, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Irving, IL.
| Data | Griffin | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,693 | 370 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,047 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Irving
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 370 in Irving.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Irving has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Irving.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Griffin and Irving at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 1 |
| White | 36 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Irving
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 1% in Irving.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irving at 91% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Irving.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 4% in Irving.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 4% in Irving.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Irving
- More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.6% in Irving.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Irving at 24.0% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 22.4% compared to 22.1% in Irving.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.3% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Irving at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 24.9% (92) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 20.5% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 9.2% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Irving
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 22.6% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.