Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Graysville, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Graysville, AL.
| Data | Griffin | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,693 | 1,885 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 44.3 years |
| Median Income | $42,047 | $65,671 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Graysville
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
- The median age in Graysville is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Graysville has a higher median income of $65,671, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- In Graysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Graysville.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Graysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 43 |
| White | 36 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Graysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 43% in Graysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Graysville at 55% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 0% in Graysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 2% in Graysville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Graysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Graysville
- In Graysville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graysville at 24.8% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 22.4% compared to 19.6% in Graysville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graysville at 15.8% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Graysville has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Graysville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 2.7% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 30.4% (573) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 29.8% (561) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 22.8% (430) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Graysville
- In Graysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.2% in Griffin.
- In Graysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.4% compared to 22.6% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graysville at 29.8%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- In Graysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.