Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Griffin Farmington hills
Population 23,693 82,737
Median Age 33.2 years 41.6 years
Median Income $42,047 $101,728
Married Families 26.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 23,693 in Griffin.
  • The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
  • Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Griffin vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Griffin Farmington hills
Black 52 18
White 36 59
Asian 1 15
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington hills at 59% compared to 36% in Griffin.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Griffin.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington hills at 6%, compared to 5% in Griffin.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Griffin Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 8.0%
Depression 19.7% 19.0%
Smoking 22.4% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 13.4% 17.5%
Obesity 38.8% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills

  • More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Griffin at 19.7% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 22.4% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 38.8% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Griffin at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Griffin Farmington hills
No Schooling 2.2% (517) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 22.6% (5,347) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 16.3% (3,859) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.9% (2,819) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents in Griffin have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.