Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Farmington hills, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Farmington hills, MI.
Data | Griffin | Farmington hills |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,693 | 82,737 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $42,047 | $101,728 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills
- The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 23,693 in Griffin.
- The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- In Farmington hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Griffin | Farmington hills |
---|---|---|
Black | 52 | 18 |
White | 36 | 59 |
Asian | 1 | 15 |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington hills at 59% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington hills at 6%, compared to 5% in Griffin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Griffin | Farmington hills |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 13.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 8.0% |
Depression | 19.7% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 38.8% | 29.1% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills
- More residents in Griffin report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Griffin at 19.7% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 22.4% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Griffin at 38.8% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Griffin at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Griffin | Farmington hills |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 0.6% (488) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 9.5% (7,900) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 6.0% (4,947) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 42.2% (34,948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Farmington hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
- More residents in Griffin have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
- In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.