Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Griffin | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,693 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $42,047 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Carthage
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Carthage has a higher median income of $47,722, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Griffin at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is identical in both Griffin and Carthage at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Griffin | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 45 |
| White | 36 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 45% in Carthage.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Griffin and Carthage at 36%.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Griffin and Carthage at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Griffin | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 22.4% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Griffin at 13.4% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Griffin | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.2% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.