Demographics details for Griffin, GA vs Brighton, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Griffin, GA vs Brighton, TN.
Data | Griffin | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,693 | 2,881 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 30.8 years |
Median Income | $42,047 | $76,202 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Griffin vs Brighton
- In Griffin, the population is higher at 23,693, compared to 2,881 in Brighton.
- Residents in Griffin have a higher median age of 33.2 years compared to 30.8 years in Brighton.
- Brighton has a higher median income of $76,202, compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- In Brighton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- The unemployment rate in Griffin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Brighton.
Demographics
Demographics Griffin vs Brighton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Griffin | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Black | 52 | 19 |
White | 36 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Griffin vs Brighton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Griffin at 52% compared to 19% in Brighton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brighton at 76% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Griffin at 5% compared to 3% in Brighton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Griffin at 5% compared to 2% in Brighton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Griffin at 1% compared to 0% in Brighton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Griffin | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 19.7% | 29.1% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 38.8% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Griffin vs Brighton
- In Brighton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brighton at 29.1% versus 19.7% in Griffin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Griffin at 22.4% compared to 19.3% in Brighton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brighton at 16.5% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Brighton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brighton at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Griffin | Brighton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (517) | 1.2% (35) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (5,347) | 18.8% (541) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (3,859) | 8.8% (253) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (2,819) | 12.2% (352) |
Education Levels Comparison: Griffin vs Brighton
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Brighton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Griffin hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 18.8% in Brighton.
- More residents in Griffin have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 8.8% in Brighton.
- In Brighton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.