Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Two rivers, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Two rivers, WI.
Data | Gresham | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Population | 111,621 | 11,166 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $69,437 | $56,236 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Two rivers
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 11,166 in Two rivers.
- The median age in Two rivers is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $56,236 in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Two rivers.
- The unemployment rate in Gresham is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.1% in Two rivers.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Two rivers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gresham | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 55 | 86 |
Asian | 5 | 1 |
Hispanic | 22 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Two rivers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 2% in Two rivers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Two rivers at 86% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 1% in Two rivers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 6% in Two rivers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 5% in Two rivers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Two rivers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gresham | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.8% |
Depression | 28.4% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 23.7% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Two rivers
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.7% in Two rivers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 24.3% in Two rivers.
- Two rivers has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Two rivers at 23.7% compared to 20.2% in Gresham.
- Two rivers has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Two rivers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gresham | Two rivers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 0.7% (83) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 24.6% (2,745) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 8.7% (974) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 17.1% (1,912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Two rivers
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 8.7% in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.