Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Gresham | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Palos park
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $69,437 in Gresham.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 55 | 88 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 1% in Palos park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 5% in Palos park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Palos park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Palos park
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gresham at 17.6% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 20.2% in Gresham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gresham at 28.6% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.