Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Gresham | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Live oak
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gresham at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 13% in Gresham.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 38 |
| White | 55 | 41 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 9% in Live oak.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 12% in Live oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Live oak
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.