Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Leitchfield, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Leitchfield, KY.
Data | Gresham | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 111,621 | 6,432 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $69,437 | $43,214 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Leitchfield
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 6,432 in Leitchfield.
- The median age in Leitchfield is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gresham at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Leitchfield at 14%, compared to 13% in Gresham.
- The unemployment rate in Gresham is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Leitchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gresham | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 55 | 95 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 22 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Leitchfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 2% in Leitchfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Leitchfield at 95% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 3% in Leitchfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gresham | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.7% |
Depression | 28.4% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 27.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Leitchfield
- In Leitchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 20.0% in Gresham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leitchfield at 30.0% versus 28.4% in Gresham.
- Leitchfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
- Leitchfield has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leitchfield at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gresham | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 0.3% (21) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 28.3% (1,821) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 23.4% (1,504) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 8.4% (540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Leitchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Leitchfield.
- In Leitchfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leitchfield at 23.4%, compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.