Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Goose creek, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Goose creek, SC.
| Data | Gresham | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 47,618 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $84,041 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Goose creek
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 47,618 in Goose creek.
- Residents in Gresham have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041, compared to $69,437 in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gresham at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Goose creek.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Goose creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 20 |
| White | 55 | 63 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Goose creek
- In Goose creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Goose creek at 63% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 3% in Goose creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 8% in Goose creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 6% in Goose creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Goose creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Goose creek
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Goose creek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 19.2% in Goose creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gresham at 17.6% compared to 15.8% in Goose creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 19.4% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Goose creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Goose creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 0.5% (235) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 12.6% (6,002) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 6.9% (3,266) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 16.2% (7,733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Goose creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Goose creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 12.6% in Goose creek.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 6.9% in Goose creek.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Gresham and Goose creek at 16.2%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.