Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Fountain run, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Fountain run, KY.
| Data | Gresham | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 221 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 49.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Fountain run
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
- The median age in Fountain run is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $38,750 in Fountain run.
- In Fountain run, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Fountain run.
- The unemployment rate in Gresham is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Fountain run provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 99 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Fountain run
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 1% in Fountain run.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain run at 99% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 22.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 30.6% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 29.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Fountain run
- In Fountain run, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 20.0% in Gresham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain run at 30.6% versus 28.4% in Gresham.
- Fountain run has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
- Fountain run has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain run at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Fountain run |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 1.8% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 42.1% (93) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 48.9% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 10.9% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Fountain run
- In Fountain run, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- In Fountain run, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.1% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fountain run at 48.9%, compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.9% in Fountain run.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.