Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Clarksville, AR.
| Data | Gresham | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 9,555 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $35,911 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Clarksville
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Gresham have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gresham at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 13% in Gresham.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 55 | 60 |
| Asian | 5 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Clarksville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 60% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 5% in Gresham.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 22% in Gresham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gresham and Clarksville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Gresham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 27.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 4.2% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 21.6% (2,064) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 28.6% (2,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.