Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Camden, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Camden, WV.
| Data | Gresham | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 184 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $46,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Camden
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 184 in Camden.
- The median age in Camden is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $46,000 in Camden.
- In Camden, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Camden.
- Camden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 100 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Camden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gresham at 4% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camden at 100% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 0% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 0% in Camden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Camden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Camden
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gresham at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gresham at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.